Hong Kong’s Cathay Pacific, and its sister airline Dragon Air, have announced an immediate ban on the carriage of shark fin on all of their flights.
In a statement released on Wednesday, Cathay said that it had rejected all 15 shipment requests for shark-related products over the past year. “We understand the community’s desire to promote responsible and sustainable marine sourcing practices,” the statement said.
The airline said it had instituted a policy agreed with two respected shark conservation agencies. The policy stated that shark or shark-related products would have to be assessed by an external panel of experts.
Experts tell us sustainable shark fisheries exist. Outright bans tend to send trade underground. https://t.co/gxy6GTPFiw (2/2)
— Cathay Pacific (@cathaypacific) June 3, 2016
Cathay had been under fire from conservation NGO WildAid. In response, the airline previously claimed that sustainable shark products existed and a ban would drive the industry underground.
Last month, protesters demonstrated at Hong Kong’s airport urging Cathay to refuse shark-fin products, whilst a petition attracted over 3,000 signatures.
Alex Hofford, a wildlife campaigner for WildAid said: “A responsible corporate like Cathay Pacific should never be seen to be a link in the supply chain for a criminal trade. That’s why we are so happy that Cathay has done the right thing by no longer carry any shark fin or shark products. Shipping sharks by air is not just an issue of sustainability, but ethics and legality.”
The NGO is now urging Hong Kong Airlines and Malindo Air to take a stance on shipping shark fin cargo and requesting that Fiji Airlines ditch their “sustainable” shark fin policy.
- Hong Kong lawmakers pass bill requiring public officers to pledge allegiance to gov’t; four district councillors to be ousted
- Organised crime bureau probes head of national security police over massage parlour scandal; police chief will not resign
- ‘Our businesses can’t survive’: Bars, clubs and karaoke lounges slam gov’t’s Covid-19 policy as unfair