Those found guilty of certain offences under Hong Kong’s proposed new security legislation, including treason and sabotage, may face life in prison, a draft bill unveiled on Friday has revealed.

Hong Kong. File photo: Kyle Lam/HKFP.
Hong Kong. File photo: Kyle Lam/HKFP.

The government on Friday introduced the Safeguarding National Security Bill – known locally as Article 23 – to the city’s legislature, which convened a rare, off-schedule meeting to begin its legislative process. Andrew Leung, president of the Legislative Council (LegCo) said the government and the LegCo must join hands in passing the bill as soon as possible, describing it as a “historical mission.”

See also: New powers proposed for police, courts to limit national security detainees’ access to lawyers

Authorities for the first time set out the proposed penalties for each of the offences included under Article 23 legislation, which covers five areas of national security crimes: treason, insurrection and incitement to mutiny, theft of state secret and espionage, sabotage, and external interference.

Among the offences that could be punished by life in prison were: treason, insurrection and sabotage, targeting acts that endanger the sovereignty of China and collusion with foreign forces in damaging public infrastructure.

Among the raft of offences included in the draft bill, most carry a maximum penalty of more than five years in jail, with some seeing higher sentences still if the offences were committed in collusion with a foreign force.

That includes sabotage by damaging or weakening public infrastructure, punishable by up to 20 years in prison. But if the offender is found to have colluded with “an external force,” they could face life behind bars.

External forces include foreign governments, political parties, international organisations as well as the personnel affiliated with them, according to the bill.

A consultation paper for Article 23 said offences relating to sabotage were directed against vandalism of transport and telecommunications facilities, citing the pro-democracy protests and unrest in 2019.

Protests erupted in June 2019 over a since-axed extradition bill. They escalated into sometimes violent displays of dissent against police behaviour, amid calls for democracy and anger over Beijing’s encroachment. Demonstrators demanded an independent probe into police conduct, amnesty for those arrested and a halt to the characterisation of protests as “riots.” 

Similarly, the new insurrection offence covers violent acts with an intention to “endanger the sovereignty, unity or territorial integrity of [China] or the public safety of [Hong Kong],” with authorities saying it could “adequately reflect… the nature of such violence [in 2019] in endangering national security.”

Legislative Council President Andrew Leung (centre) and lawmakers meet the press on March 8, 2024, after a special, off-schedule meeting for the first and second reading of the Article 23 of the Basic Law.
Legislative Council President Andrew Leung (centre) and lawmakers meet the press on March 8, 2024, after a special, off-schedule meeting for the first and second reading of the Article 23 of the Basic Law. Photo: Kyle Lam/HKFP.

New offences are introduced in the draft bill that fall outside of the five areas of crime, including “Unlawful harassment of persons handling cases or work concerning national security,” punishable by up to 10 years in jail.

“Prejudicing investigation of offences endangering national security” and “making available or dealing with funds to absconder” are proposed with up to seven years in prison.

Lawmakers are set to convene over the weekend for extra meetings to push forward the legislative process, according to local media reports.

Article 23 of the Basic Law stipulates that the government shall enact laws on its own to prohibit acts of treason, secession, sedition and subversion against Beijing. Its legislation failed in 2003 following mass protests and it remained taboo until after the onset of the separate, Beijing-imposed security law in 2020. Pro-democracy advocates fear it could have a negative effect on civil liberties but the authorities say there is a constitutional duty to ratify it.

Support HKFP  |  Policies & Ethics  |  Error/typo?  |  Contact Us  |  Newsletter  | Transparency & Annual Report | Apps

TRUST PROJECT HKFP
SOPA HKFP
IPI HKFP

Help safeguard press freedom & keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team

contribute to hkfp methods
national security
legal precedents hong kong
security law
security law transformed hong kong
national security
security law

Hans Tse is a reporter at Hong Kong Free Press with an interest in local politics, academia, and media transformation. He was previously a social science researcher, with writing published in the Social Movement Studies and Social Transformation of Chinese Societies journals. He holds an M.Phil in communication from the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Before joining HKFP, He also worked as a freelance reporter for Initium between 2019 and 2021, where he covered the height - and aftermath - of the 2019 protests, as well as the sweeping national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020.