A Hong Kong court has convicted 11 people of rioting in Wan Chai a day after the controversial anti-mask law was enacted in October 2019. The judge said the group was present at the protest scene to “strengthen the momentum of the rioting crowd.”

Hong Kong protesters defy the anti-mask law on October 6, 2019. Photo: May James / HKFP.

District Judge Josiah Lam on Saturday found the 11 defendants – aged 18 to 32 – guilty of rioting on October 6, 2019, when masked demonstrators defied a new emergency law that banned face coverings at protests and clashed with the police violently across the city.

The defendants who had denied the rioting charge were among a group of people arrested by the police near Wan Chai’s Hennessy Road. Protesters in the area were said to have hurled Molotov cocktails and bricks at police officers, set fire to debris, as well as damaged the road surface with a road breaker truck.

In his 89-page judgement, Lam said the defendants were not bystanders and had “deliberately equipped themselves” to take part in the unlawful assembly. They possessed equipment usually worn by protesters, the court said, including helmets, gas masks, face masks, goggles and gloves. The judge ruled that they knew there was a breach of peace on the frontlines of the protest and nevertheless chose to remain at the scene.

Protest scene from October 6, 2019. Photo: May James/HKFP.

“[They] willingly became members of the rioting crowd,” the court ruled. “They were there to strengthen the momentum of the rioting crowd by their presence at the assembly in order to encourage or support other rioters.”

Laser pointed ‘weapon’

Those convicted on Saturday were Jeffa Chow Ming-chi, Leung Yiu-man, Lai Lok-hang, Coq Ho Ko-kiu, Leung Wai-fung, Lam Wing-chung, Cheung Fung-kiu, Shum Long-yin, So Long-ho, U Suet-ching and Leung See-ting.

Seven of them were also found guilty of breaching the mask ban. They were still wearing facial coverings when they were apprehended by the police, which “likely prevented identification,” Lam said.

An anti-mask rally in 2019. File Photo: May James/HKFP.

Separately, the ninth defendant So was convicted of possessing offensive weapon by owning a laser pointer. The court said that, while the laser beam emitted could not injure the eyes of police officers owing to the distant location of So, he still intended to use the device to “disturb the vision” of the officers and cause “functional injury” to their eyes.

The group was remanded into custody pending sentencing on May 7. The maximum penalty for rioting in Hong Kong is 10 years behind bars, but the jail terms handed down by the District Court is capped at seven years.

Support HKFP  |  Code of Ethics  |  Error/typo?  |  Contact Us  |  Newsletter  | Transparency & Annual Report

Support press freedom & help us surpass 1,000 monthly Patrons: 100% independent, governed by an ethics code & not-for-profit, Hong Kong Free Press is #PressingOn with impartial, award-winning, frontline coverage.

Kelly Ho

Kelly Ho has an interest in local politics, education and sports. She formerly worked at South China Morning Post Young Post, where she specialised in reporting on issues related to Hong Kong youth. She has a bachelor's degree in Journalism from the University of Hong Kong, with a second major in Politics and Public Administration.