Has the hapless Lam administration ever put a foot wrong? If you care to enter the Alice in Wonderland land of government propaganda you will be entranced to discover that even in the extraordinary circumstances of the pandemic, the wise people in Tamar have rarely erred.
Reality tells quite another story. Carrie Lam, the Chief Executive in Name Only (CENO), seems bent on emulating France’s ailing Bourbon dynasty who, in the 18th and 19th century, were famously accused of having “learned nothing and forgotten nothing” as they went from blunder to blunder.
In the CENO’s latest Bourbon-esque move she and her minions have declared that last week’s virus-hunting lockdown in Jordan was a great success.
Let’s try measuring this great success: 3,000 people were deployed to test some 7,000 residents. Thirteen were found to be carrying the virus, a success rate of 0.17 per cent.
Even if you set aside the almost criminal wastage of human resources, the dismal results of this enterprise and the shaky scientific rationale for targeting a tiny area, there is the matter of how those affected were treated. At a stroke, people living on the edge of extreme poverty lost badly needed earnings and small enterprises teetering on the brink of collapse had to throw away their stock. In response the best that the CENO had to offer was that people needed “to bite the bullet and carry on.”
And, just in case anyone missed this contemptible lack of concern for those affected in Jordan, the government distributed pork luncheon meat in an area of significant Muslim occupation. This may not have been a Xinjiang-style deliberate attempt to humiliate Muslims but it was an act of carelessness that typifies the Lam administration’s attitude to those without influence.
Why did the government embark on this largely pointless exercise in the first place? Could it have been the CENO’s response to calls from the Mainland for Hong Kong to assume a “wartime” awareness of the problem and act in a decisive manner, as seen in widely-used lockdowns in mainland cities?
Who knows what really goes in the opaque corridors of Tamar? However, we do know that this “success” followed that other great government “success” last September, the rollout of the community “universal” testing programme that ended up testing a mere quarter of the population, some 1.7 million people. A paltry 32 cases of infection were unearthed.
Staggeringly, some 10,000 people were deployed to carry out this charade; 6,000 healthcare workers and 4,000 civil servants as well as 2,000 IT backup staff. This squandering of resources on a herculean scale barely elicited comment because people have become immune to the government’s profligate behaviour.
Meanwhile Hong Kong still awaits the start of a vaccination programme. While other governments have got on with the job the CENO has been far more preoccupied with the politics of vaccination.
Lam, who castigates others for playing politics, has strained every sinew to turn the business of vaccination into a deep red display of patriotic fervour. She has focused on getting supplies from mainland companies and never misses an opportunity to stress how much the central government is helping.
The reality however is that, aside from the leading Quislings, not a single person has been vaccinated. The Sinovac vaccine, the government’s number one choice, has yet to pass the required testing regime but there is a vague chance that supplies will come from the Shanghai-based Fosun group, importing Pfizer vaccines from Germany.
Just in case memories are short, now may be a good time to remind ourselves of the CENO’s infamous remark last February when she said, “I don’t want to particularly describe how well my Government has been doing.” This mindboggling piece of self-congratulation came after blunders in securing supplies of protective equipment, a failure to close the border with the mainland in a timely manner, a failure to evacuate Hongkongers from Wuhan…the list goes on.
The legacy of these failures lives on as the Hospital Authority has chosen to “celebrate” the fourth wave of the virus by “leniently” docking the pay of staff who protested over the government’s failures in combating the coronavirus, despite validation of their complaints as the administration eventually got round to acceding to their demands.
Just in case anyone believes that Lam and her Muppets are going to learn anything from their failures, let’s have a quick look at what they have planned: a big airport expansion to match an inevitable downturn in demand; and a total refusal to address hygiene issues in old buildings, a proven cause of infection, in preference to a focus on a grandiose mega-project for new housing on reclaimed land. As for helping those in real need right now, the government has made it clear that its hands are tied because money must be saved for its grand schemes.
As they don’t say in Tamar, but fervently believe in private – legacy projects first, the people second.
Correction 1/2: A previous version of this op-ed drew incorrect conclusions from testing data, falsely suggesting that Hong Kong had an infection rate of 0.68 per cent.
Support HKFP | Policies & Ethics | Error/typo? | Contact Us | Newsletter | Transparency & Annual Report | Apps
Help safeguard press freedom & keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team
| HKFP is an impartial platform & does not necessarily share the views of opinion writers or advertisers. HKFP presents a diversity of views & regularly invites figures across the political spectrum to write for us. Press freedom is guaranteed under the Basic Law, security law, Bill of Rights and Chinese constitution. Opinion pieces aim to point out errors or defects in the government, law or policies, or aim to suggest ideas or alterations via legal means without an intention of hatred, discontent or hostility against the authorities or other communities. |
More HKFP OPINION:
HKFP has an impartial stance, transparent funding, and balanced coverage guided by an Ethics Code and Corrections Policy.
Support press freedom & help us surpass 1,000 monthly Patrons: 100% independent, governed by an ethics code & not-for-profit.
