A revised law dramatically expanding China’s definition of espionage came into force on Saturday, giving Beijing more power than ever to punish what it deems threats to national security.

China national emblem PolyU main entrance opening August 24, 2022
File Photo: Kelly Ho/HKFP.

The United States government, analysts, and lawyers say that the revisions to Beijing’s anti-espionage law are vague and will give authorities more leeway in implementing already opaque national security legislation.

Originally released for public comment in December 2022, the revisions were formally approved by China’s top legislative body in April.

Chinese law already meted out harsh punishment for those involved in alleged espionage, from life in prison to execution in extreme cases.

In May, a 78-year-old US citizen was sentenced to life in prison on spying charges.

Under the revised law, “relying on espionage organisations and their agents” as well as the unauthorised obtaining of “documents, data, materials, and items related to national security and interests” can constitute a spying offence.

Beijing insists it has the right to “safeguard its national security through legislation” and says it will “uphold the rule of law”.

But experts have warned that the changes could sweep up those with even tenuous links to organisations accused of spying.

Mintz Group
Mintz Group. Photo: HKFP remix.

They come in the face of an already tense environment for foreign businesses in China, following raids on and questioning of staff at due diligence company Mintz Group and consulting giant Bain and Company this year.

The new law embodies a “whole-of-society approach to dealing with anything that is a risk to this broad definition of national security”, Jeremy Daum, senior research fellow at Yale’s Paul Tsai China Center, told AFP.

Daum said the law builds on a broader trend of tightening control since 2014, after President Xi Jinping took power.

But its vague definition of espionage and national security gives authorities a wider berth, he added, and will likely have a “chilling effect on Chinese citizens who have contact with foreigners and foreign organisations” .

The new revisions have ruffled feathers among the business community, with companies fearing even tighter scrutiny.

The changes “have raised legitimate concerns about conducting certain routine business activities, which now risk being considered espionage”, Craig Allen, President of the US-China Business Council, wrote in a recent blog.

Usa us flag china chinese
The US and Chinese flag. File photo: Tom Grundy/HKFP.

“Confidence in China’s market will suffer further if the law is applied frequently and without a clear, narrow and direct link to activities universally recognized as espionage,” wrote Allen.

Diplomatic officials from several countries have also sounded alarm bells ahead of the legal changes, urging citizens in China to be vigilant.

The US State Department said the law will “greatly expand the scope of what (Beijing) considers espionage activities”.

Deputy spokesman Vedant Patel said Washington would “continue to speak out for human rights and rule of law issues and promote accountability for (China’s) repressive activities, which this of course would be one”.

And the US National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) warned Friday that the law gives Beijing “expanded legal grounds for accessing and controlling data held by US firms in China”.

Support HKFP  |  Policies & Ethics  |  Error/typo?  |  Contact Us  |  Newsletter  | Transparency & Annual Report | Apps

TRUST PROJECT HKFP
SOPA HKFP
IPI HKFP

Help safeguard press freedom & keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team

press freedom day hkfp
contribute to hkfp methods
YouTube video

Support press freedom & help us surpass 1,000 monthly Patrons: 100% independent, governed by an ethics code & not-for-profit.

Agence France-Press (AFP) is "a leading global news agency providing fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the events shaping our world and of the issues affecting our daily lives." HKFP relies on AFP, and its international bureaus, to cover topics we cannot. Read their Ethics Code here