With less than six months of her term to go, Chief Executive Carrie Lam kick-started a government overhaul on the first day of a new legislative session on Wednesday, aiming to keep government structure abreast of the times. That could not be more ironic.
Elevated to the top post in July 2017, Mrs Lam, who has a penchant for claiming she knows the government machinery well and policy-making from A to Z, launched the biggest government revamp for 15 years just as her five-year term is nearing its end.
She is hoping that the plan, which calls for revamping roughly half of the 13 existing bureaux, will be completed before her term ends on June 30. The total number of bureaux will be increased to 15.
Of the plan, separating the housing portfolio from the existing Transport and Housing Bureau is an attempt to help ease public anger over the chronic problem of land and housing supply shortages. The Transport and Logistics Bureau would focus on infrastructure and consolidating the city’s status as an aviation hub.
Another major change features upgrading the importance of youth policy by renaming the Home Affairs Bureau as the Home and Youth Affairs Bureau.
‘Young people are our future’
While putting land and housing on top of her agenda when she took power, Mrs Lam underscored the importance of connecting with young people even before that. Young people figured prominently in her 2017 chief executive election campaign.
In her maiden policy address, she said: “Young people are our future… In the next five years, we will strive to do our best in youth development work by addressing their concerns about education, career pursuit and home ownership, and encouraging their participation in politics as well as policy discussion and debate.”
Four and a half years on, her youth work has failed miserably. Thousands of young students were arrested during the anti-extradition bill protests. Thousands of students went to study abroad, many of whom were accompanied by their parents to build new homes. They will probably never return.
In her concluding remarks in the 2017 policy blueprint, Mrs Lam said: “My vision is for a Hong Kong of hope and happiness – a day we are all proud to call our home.”
Her vision became the city’s nightmare. Young people are among those from different walks of life who do not see hope but despair, not happiness but sadness.
Ironically, her government overhaul initiative has served as a harsh reminder to Hongkongers how badly she has done on various fronts – and how damaging her leadership, or lack thereof, has been to the city.
Not surprisingly, it helps little in stirring public discussion, not to mention shoring up confidence in her leadership.
Instead of commenting on the overhaul plan after Mrs Lam announced details in her opening remarks, some legislators pointed to her failure to prevent the spread of the Omicron coronavirus variant in the community.
They put the blame on the airline Cathay Pacific, whose crew members violated home quarantine rules, actions that led to the fifth community outbreak. Government laxity in guarding against infections caused by imported cases is to blame, they said.
Cheung Chi-kong, a long-time ally of former chief executive Leung Chun-ying, lost no time in trashing the revamp plan as untimely and irrelevant at a time when her priority should be stemming the transmission of Omicron.
In an article published on the Chinese-language Ming Pao on Thursday, Cheung said he asked a person who is interested in contesting the top post about the plan. Cheung quoted him as saying, “Why should I want her to prepare my election platform?”
Cheung asked: “Why can the current chief executive decide the governing structure of the next chief executive’s government? Executive-led is executive-led, not Carrie Lam-led?”
No plan for the city?
True, rationalising government structure in the face of rapid changes in society is sensible and normal. But it is clearly not the major reason for government policy failures and blunders.
Does Mrs Lam seriously believe the youth problem will be resolved overnight by adding “youth affairs” to the name of the home affairs bureau? Will the new housing and development bureau use magic to solve the huge housing shortfall? The answer is simple: No.
The overhaul plan does mean something. It has laid bare the plain truth that she no longer has a plan for the city. And even if she has some feasible ideas, she will not be able to deliver them. Her days seem to be numbered, at long last.
Support HKFP | Policies & Ethics | Error/typo? | Contact Us | Newsletter | Transparency & Annual Report | Apps
| HKFP is an impartial platform & does not necessarily share the views of opinion writers or advertisers. HKFP presents a diversity of views & regularly invites figures across the political spectrum to write for us. Press freedom is guaranteed under the Basic Law, security law, Bill of Rights and Chinese constitution. Opinion pieces aim to point out errors or defects in the government, law or policies, or aim to suggest ideas or alterations via legal means without an intention of hatred, discontent or hostility against the authorities or other communities. |
Help safeguard press freedom & keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team
More HKFP OPINION:
HKFP has an impartial stance, transparent funding, and balanced coverage guided by an Ethics Code and Corrections Policy.
Support press freedom & help us surpass 1,000 monthly Patrons: 100% independent, governed by an ethics code & not-for-profit.
