Five police officers jailed for assaulting activist Ken Tsang in 2014 have been denied permission to appeal their convictions.
The Court of Appeal ruled on Friday that the men could not take their case to Hong Kong’s top court because it did not present any “points of law of great and general importance.” Despite the rejection, the police officers will try to seek permission to appeal from the Court of Final Appeal directly, their lawyer told RTHK.
On October 15, 2014, at the height of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy Umbrella Movement, social worker Ken Tsang was beaten up by seven police officers in a dimly-lit street corner outside the government’s headquarters. The officers said Tsang had provoked them by pouring water on colleagues clearing a nearby protest site.
The officers were convicted and jailed in February 2017, though all of them lodged appeals and were released on bail having served only six months or less respectively.
In July, the Court of Appeal overturned the convictions of two of the officers, and reduced the sentences of the remaining five. The judges responsible said they did so because the original prison sentences were “manifestly excessive.”
No ‘point of law’
In the appeal application, defence lawyers raised the question of how video evidence can be used in legal settings. Tsang’s assault was caught on tape by news crews such as TVB, but the original footage was never played in court.
However, the three appeal judges – Jeremy Poon, Ian McWalters and Andre Macrae – said that the issue was “well-settled” and need not be discussed at the Court of Final Appeal.
“At no stage of the trial proceedings did any of the defendants’ counsel… ever mount any application for the originals to be produced at trial… nor was an application for a stay of proceedings mounted on the basis that a fair trial was impossible without the original tape recordings,” the judges wrote in their 7-page judgment.
“That was because there was a deliberate tactical decision by trial counsel to take advantage of the absence of the originals.”
The defendants were trying to make a “factual complaint” about how the trial judge evaluated the evidence, which was not a permissible ground for the application, the judges added.
In Hong Kong, the Court of Final Appeal will only hear criminal cases if they involve “a point of law of great and general importance,” or “substantial and grave injustice” has been done.
The five defendants were police chief inspector Wong Cho-shing, 51, senior inspector Lau Cheuk-ngai, 32, detective sergeant Pak Wing-bun, 45, and constables Chan Siu-tan, 34 and Kwan Ka-ho, 35.
They will continue to serve the remainder of their sentences, which range from 15 to 18 months.
Hong Kong Free Press relies on direct reader support. Help safeguard independent journalism and press freedom as we invest more in freelancers, overtime, safety gear & insurance during this summer’s protests. 10 ways to support us.
- University of Hong Kong appoints mainland professors as vice-presidents amid concerns over academic freedom
- EXCLUSIVE: Only 17% of Hongkongers approve of proposal to allow HK election voting in China despite Lam claim – HKFP-PORI poll
- Covid-19: Beaches to reopen on Fri, dine-in limit raised to 6 people – but 4-person public gathering limit to stay