The government’s plan to adjust cross-harbour tunnel tolls has hit another stumbling block, as Chief Executive Carrie Lam admitted on Tuesday that the proposal was unlikely to be approved at the legislature.

The plan, which is aimed at alleviating cross-harbour traffic congestion, would result in the three tunnels having similar pricing for private cars. The government submitted a non-binding motion to the Legislative Council in January, but abandoned it due to a lack of lawmaker support.

Speaking before the regular Executive Council meeting on Tuesday, Lam said that the government had originally planned to submit a similar motion the next day, but she was aware it was unlikely to pass.

Carrie Lam
Carrie Lam. Photo: RTHK screenshot.

“This type of motion would need a simple majority to pass, but I have noticed [news] reports that the chance for majority support is very low,” she told reporters.

However, Lam did not say whether the new motion would be officially withdrawn, only adding that the government would provide more details soon.

In the proposal, tolls for private cars at the Cross-Harbour Tunnel would rise from HK$20 to HK$40. Cars using the Eastern Harbour Crossing would also pay HK$40 instead of HK$25, whilst Western Harbour Crossing fares for private cars would be reduced from HK$70 to HK$50.

Lam defended the move, saying that a second setback would not affect her administration’s efficacy, and should not be seen as a sign of weakness: “I must stress that… for this type of work, if it does not become a reality, does that affect the government’s reputation or governance? I believe the answer is no.”

Cross-Harbour Tunnel congestion
Cross-Harbour Tunnel congestion. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/WiNG.

“Instead, it shows that the current administration… will try our best to find a feasible proposal to solve social problems – but Hong Kong is a diverse society, not to mention there are vested interests, so there are some public reactions [to the proposal].”

Losing pro-Beijing camp support

Lam said on Tuesday that she was not sure what the exact reasons were behind lawmakers’ reluctance. “I can’t tell the reasons why they don’t support it… they just won’t support it,” she said.

Speaking on a radio programme on Monday, lawmaker Ben Chan from the pro-Beijing DAB party said he was worried that the new plan would lead to all three tunnels being congested.

Chan, who was also chair of the legislature’s panel on transport, said that there was substantial opposition to the government’s plan among his constituents, and that the March proposal was no better than the January one.

Ben Chan hang-pan
Ben Chan hang-pan. Photo: HKFP/Catherine Lai.

Lawmaker Michael Luk from the pro-Beijing Federation of Trade Unions (FTU) also said that the government was unable to provide data to show that the plan would alleviate congestion.

The government currently runs the Cross-Harbour Tunnel and Eastern Harbour Crossing, but Chinese corporation CITIC group controls the Western Harbour Crossing until 2023.


The Hong Kong Free Press #PressForFreedom 2019 Funding Drive seeks to raise HK$1.2m to support our non-profit newsroom and dedicated team of multi-media, multi-lingual reporters.  HKFP is backed by readers, run by journalists and is immune to political and commercial pressure. This year’s critical fundraiser will provide us with the essential funds to continue our work into next year.

hong kong free press 2019 press for freedom funding drive footer (2)

Holmes Chan is a reporter at Hong Kong Free Press. He covers local news with a focus on law, politics, and social movements. He studied law and literature at the University of Hong Kong.