By Oiwan Lam
Days after the United States, the United Kingdom and France launched airstirkes in Syria in response to the suspected use of chemical weapons near Damascus by the Syrian government, Chinese President Xi Jinping called British Prime Minister Theresa May and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, stressing the need to cool down the conflict and investigate the chemical attacks.
But China’s state-owned media outlets echoed Russia’s allegation that the chemical attacks in Douma were staged. Microblogging website Weibo’s top search result showed a China Central Television report about a Russian journalist’s interview with a Syrian child who was featured in a video distributed by various Western media outlets:
[mks_tabs nav=”horizontal”]
[mks_tab_item title=”Translation”]
Russian reporter revealed the ‘chemical attack’ video was fake: the Syrian boy explained how the video was staged] According to Russian report, the ‘white helmet’ organization workers, supported by Britain and other Western countries, used food to lure Syrian kids into making the fake video that showed the so-called catastrophe of a chemical attack. The 11-year-old boy, Hassan, who received first aid after the purported chemical attacks, said, ‘People grabbed me and poured water all over me when I entered [the first aid station].’[/mks_tab_item]
[mks_tab_item title=”Original Quote”]
【俄记者揭露叙“化武袭击”造假视频：小男孩讲述摆拍过程】据俄罗斯媒体报道，英国等西方国家支持的“白头盔”组织人员用食物引诱叙利亚儿童拍摄虚假视频，炮制叙利亚遭所谓化武袭击后的惨状。视频里，人们正在紧急救治所谓“化武袭击”后的11岁男孩哈桑，而哈桑说：“刚一进去就有人把我抓住，开始把水浇到我身上。”[/mks_tab_item]
[/mks_tabs]
As anticipated, the CCTV news features attracted a number of nationalistic and anti-imperialist comments, like this one:
[mks_tabs nav=”horizontal”]
[mks_tab_item title=”Translation”]
More than one hundred years ago, the U.S., Britain and France invaded China and burned the Old Summer Palace; today they invaded Syria. The nature of imperialists has never changed.[/mks_tab_item]
[mks_tab_item title=”Original Quote”]
一百多年前，美英法入侵中国，烧毁圆明园，今天，它们入侵叙利亚。帝国主义列强的强盗本性一直都没变。[/mks_tab_item]
[/mks_tabs]
The Syrian civil war broke out after several months of a violent government crackdown against unarmed protesters in 2011; the armed conflict has led to the death of more than half a million people in the country. Despite the subsequent humanitarian crisis, China has often sided with Russia in vetoing United Nations Security Council resolutions on the crisis, claiming that military invention and economic sanctions would derail the issue of political settlement and undermine regional peace and stability. China has supported five of the seven Russian-led vetoes.
After the US-led airstrikes, China again voted in favor of a resolution drafted by Russia to condemn the military interventions. China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, Hua Chunying, stressed:
As always, we oppose the use of force in international relations and call for respect for other countries’ sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity. Any unilateral military action bypassing the Security Council runs contrary to the purpose and principles of the UN charter and violates the principles of international law and the basic norms governing international relations, and will further complicate the Syrian issue.
At the same time, viral commentary circulated on various social media platforms comparing the current Syrian crisis to China’s situation during the First and Second World Wars, and arguing that weak countries will always be bullied by strong ones — hence, it is essential for China to become strong.
However, many netizens did not buy the Russian version of the story — although, to be accurate, Russia put forward several accounts of the events, first claiming that the chemical attacks were staged, then that they were real but Assad wasn’t responsible, then that they were indeed staged, but by the UK. Russian state TV even used a set from a movie to emphasize that the attacks were fake.
Judging from the CCTV discussion thread on Weibo, though, it was the “fake news” narrative that stuck, many netizens found it implausible:
[mks_tabs nav=”horizontal”]
[mks_tab_item title=”Translation”]
Who can prove that this video was not staged? Who can prove that this video is for real?[/mks_tab_item]
[mks_tab_item title=”Original Quote”]
谁证明这个不是摆拍的。？谁能证明这个视频的真实性？[/mks_tab_item]
[/mks_tabs]
[mks_tabs nav=”horizontal”]
[mks_tab_item title=”Translation”]
Do not believe Russia.[/mks_tab_item]
[mks_tab_item title=”Original Quote”]
不要相信俄罗斯 [/mks_tab_item]
[/mks_tabs]
[mks_tabs nav=”horizontal”]
[mks_tab_item title=”Translation”]
In contemporary world history, Russia has a role in all evil deeds.[/mks_tab_item]
[mks_tab_item title=”Original Quote”]
世界近代史，所有的邪恶都与俄罗斯有关 [/mks_tab_item]
[/mks_tabs]
@ComYouthLeague, a political satire social media outlet, mocked China’s propaganda:
【短评】美国此次轰炸叙利亚，中国媒体造谣煽动力度非常大。这侧面说明戳到了中国政府的痛处。此前俄罗斯爹地一再暗示强硬保护阿萨德。结果美国扔了一通导弹，俄罗斯大气不敢出，更别说帮着拦导弹了。这让习近平心里怎么想？俄罗斯爹地怎么不要孩儿们了？说好的再爱我一次呢？ pic.twitter.com/FEMRUtrpIi
— 共青团流亡中央 (@ComYouthLeague) April 17, 2018
[Short commentary] Mainland Chinese media outlets spent great effort in spreading rumors concerning the U.S. airstrikes in Syria. This, in a way, reflected that airstrikes had hurt the Chinese government. The Russian daddy once promised that he would protect Assad. Yet, the US launched airstrikes and Russia could not do anything, let alone block the missiles. How would Xi feel about that? Has the Russian daddy given up on his kids? What has happened to the promise of love?
One key component that is missing from the Chinese social media discussion is the misery of the Syrian people — and it begs the ethical question of why China, if it really is a strong country, keeps voting at the UN against international intervention, under the pretext of state sovereignty. If Western countries are the imperialists as Chinese propaganda authorities and nationalists have suggested, what is China in the arena of international politics?
This article first appeared on Global Voices on April 22.
